Book Ghostwriter Agreement

The contract should also list the cases and consequences of early termination on both sides. For example, what happens if the Ghostwriter can`t complete the project? Or if the client decides to hire someone else. It is quite acceptable to charge a cancellation fee if the client cancels the project prematurely. For example, my contract states that if my clients terminate their contract, I have to pay for all the services provided so far as well as a cancellation fee of $150.00. I waive this tax if circumstances require it, but having it in the contract leaves it to me to do so. Since ghostwriters only work behind the scenes, there should be a clause in your contract regarding confidentiality. This can also be called a «confidentiality clause» in which the Ghostwriter agrees to keep your business relationship secret. That way, only you know you`ve set up a ghostwriter. READ ALSO: How to get the most out of your ghostwriter. The contract should also define the payment methods accepted by the Ghostwriter. For example, I only accept cheques, payment orders or credit cards by PayPal.

Some ghostwriters only accept payment orders. A six-month job can easily take 12 months. Our contracts all set an «expected» end date, like an «expected» end date of a pregnancy, at the end of which a book is born. Problems often arise when there are several offers of work or requests for exclusive rights and there is no agreement between employees. Indeed, a recalcitrant employee can prevent the other employee from granting or transferring exclusive rights to the plant to a third party. Another worst-case scenario is the unilateral shutdown of the project by the theme of autobiographical work, as was the case during the failure of the collaboration between Fay Vincent, the former baseball commissioner, and David Kaplan. To illustrate the importance of an exit strategy, Vincent, after 90% of Vincent`s memoirs, withdrew the project from his publishing house and thwarted Kaplan`s efforts to publish the book under Kaplan`s proper name. See Kaplan v. Vincent, 937 F. Supp. 307 (SDNY 1996).

If the parties had a well-developed cooperation agreement, unlike the oral agreement, they would have avoided legal entanglements. Even if it is a direct agreement between an author and his mind, they should still discuss the rights of authorization of the manuscript. Most authors want to be sure that the first designs are not third-party, such as.B. from a publisher or agent, until they have seen and signed them themselves…